Hello Folks, (all 3 or 4 of you, Susan, Bear, Lynda, Nathalie, Victoria!)
I'm not really back yet. I know the Synod on the family is beginning and I should just be praying and fasting! But--speaking about whom should be denied Holy Communion---something happened to me on Saturday, 4 October, which I earlier only suspected was the stuff of urban legend. My apologies to all you who have suffered this embarrassment...now I know such things really do happen!
I was visiting a Catholic Church in a large city not far from Corpus Christi....(I am being deliberately vague) where a young-ish (about 50 years old) and ebullient Catholic priest refused me Communion for kneeling.
'Friend, please stand for Communion'...
'I can wait, Father',
pause pause...
I surrender and move on.
Spiritual Communion for me!
I have his email address and am going to write him. I want you all to follow along to see if I utterly fail in my attempt to win him over. I will be 'scrubbing' references which might allow outsiders to identify either 'Father Friend' or yours truly, Sorry!!
My first email, minus the [scrubbed] material looks like what is posted below in bold italics, ..... When and if Father Friend replies, I'll make a new post of it....
[[[ME AGAIN]]]]
I'm not really back yet. I know the Synod on the family is beginning and I should just be praying and fasting! But--speaking about whom should be denied Holy Communion---something happened to me on Saturday, 4 October, which I earlier only suspected was the stuff of urban legend. My apologies to all you who have suffered this embarrassment...now I know such things really do happen!
I was visiting a Catholic Church in a large city not far from Corpus Christi....(I am being deliberately vague) where a young-ish (about 50 years old) and ebullient Catholic priest refused me Communion for kneeling.
'Friend, please stand for Communion'...
'I can wait, Father',
pause pause...
I surrender and move on.
Spiritual Communion for me!
I have his email address and am going to write him. I want you all to follow along to see if I utterly fail in my attempt to win him over. I will be 'scrubbing' references which might allow outsiders to identify either 'Father Friend' or yours truly, Sorry!!
My first email, minus the [scrubbed] material looks like what is posted below in bold italics, ..... When and if Father Friend replies, I'll make a new post of it....
Hello Father Friend!
I worshiped with your
[SCRUBBED] Catholic Community on Saturday 04 October.
By way of background,
Father, I am a[RAPPORT BUILDING SCRUBBED]. I see you are also a [SCRUBBED]therefore
I hope you will not take my words the wrong-way, but more as grumbling coming from
one [SCRUBBED] to another J!
I think you probably
know why I am writing, but in case you don’t please forgive me the recap: My [SCRUBBED]is in your town and I
live some [SCRUBBED]miles distant. I was just
getting back to my hotel and was still in my work uniform, barely in time to
make your Saturday vigil. I was edified by your sermon, your celebration of the
Holy Mass. I love that your bulletin emphasized October as our Lady’s month and
many other things…..however when it came time for Holy Communion….as you know-unless
you do this kind of thing quite often and routinely…I was shocked when you refused
to give me Holy Communion!
What was my crime, my
public sin? I knealt to receive our Lord.
Father, again by way of
background perspective, this is the first time, that any priest has (ever!) made a public example of me at the Communion
rail-- never in the multitude of parishes – Lifeteen, guitar, Pentecostal, 80’s
style, etc. -to which my professional travels have taken me in the U.S. and abroad, certainly never by any [SCRUBBED]!
My purpose in writing
this letter is not to cry about the embarrassment you caused me, as I believe
such things should be ‘cheerfully endured’ and there from benefited, but
instead I want to find out why you acted the way you did. As I see it, Father, we could not have both been
acting rightly. Either :
–a- Father was wrong to deny me Communion
or –b- I
was wrong to kneel for Communion.
I do
not rule out the latter possibility, but if you will convince me that it is
wrong or forbidden to kneel at one’s most intimate encounter with Jesus Christ,
(an venerable and august tradition) then I feel you do owe me an explanation! If my wide-spread experience mentioned above is
in any way representative of things in general, I am afraid your action leaves
you quite alone on this. That per se does not mean you are wrong!
However neither do I
rule out the former -a- as also a possibility, i.e. that Father-acting in good
conscience- might have been wrong. In
which case please be assured that I am determined –as one of your very own order once put
it- “never to despair your recovery” and will vigorously try to win you over to
my side!
Do pray for me and do know
that I am praying for you!
[[[FATHER WRITES A GOOD REPLY]]
[[[FATHER WRITES A GOOD REPLY]]
Good morning K.C.
Thank you for your personal and
faith-filled message. I appreciate your
message and tone, and hope that my
reply will match your sincerity.
Saturday I did not intend to deny
you Holy Communion, nor to cause undue
attention to you. I intended
to follow the norms as given to our
archdiocese and the
Catholic Church in the USA.
Let me first state that I had just
talked about the reception of Holy
Communion to the three congregations
one week prior to Saturday, and that
was. The whole of the
instruction in the link comes from the United States
Catholic Conference of Bishops. This
group, according to the General
Instruction of the roman Missal is
authorized by the Vatican's Congregation
for Divine Worship to set the
practice for the reception of Holy Communion.
http://www.usccb.org/prayer-and-worship/the-mass/order-of-mass/liturgy-of-th
e-eucharist/the-reception-of-holy-communion-at-mass.cfm
The text is below.
The points which I made were the
unity of the body of believers in the
procession and the reception of Holy
Communion, the proper display of
reverence (bow) and the courtesy of
opening one's mouth or holding out one's
hands to receive Our Lord.
With respect to kneeling. Are you
wrong to kneel? In a word, yes. It's not a
sin, nor a crime.
The bishops state, "In
the United States, the body of Bishops determined
that Communion should be received
standing,"
In addition to the principle of
unity, we have no Communion rail and the
concern about foot traffic and
safety is real. In other places/circumstances
kneeling is fine. I ask
you to read the bishop's instruction and take to
heart their message, particularly
where they state: "These norms may
require some adjustment on the part
of those who have been used to other
practices, however the significance
of unity in posture and gesture as a
symbol of our unity as members of
the one body of Christ should be the
governing factor in our own
actions."
With respect to your question,
"Am I wrong to deny you Communion?" I did not
deny you Holy Communion, nor was it
my intention to deny you Holy Communion.
I was surprised by your departure
when I said to you "please rise to receive
Communion." As such I had no
opportunity to address the matter r reception
of Communion. ask you to see me
after Mass. There was an added challenge
this past Saturday in particular
because of a blessing of a parishioner who
is to [SCRUBBED] this week and the
purposeful procession to the parish dinner at
the other chapel. I am sorry that I
did not see you afterwards.
In addition to being obedient, I
believe that I am a priest who should look
at people with a pastoral approach
of applying the norms. It's a challenge
to be pastorally sensitive and
instructive during the reception of the Holy
Communion. Since you desire to
receive Holy Communion kneeling, I counsel
you to bring this up to a priest
before Mass, asking for an accommodation. I
have made pastoral accommodations
only for [SCRUBBED]
but I do not do this without knowing
this request in advance. Politely put
and respectfully intended, the
responsibility rests on those who do not
follow the Church's norm. What I ask
is that they be the last person in the
procession to receive Holy
Communion. I extend this accommodation to you
with the note to politely ask
for the accommodation before Mass begins.
At Mass I mentioned that I am a
Jesuit. Having professed final vows[SCRUBBED]years
ago, I do take the vow of obedience
seriously. Being a Jesuit, I know that
if I do not educate the congregation
about general instructions for the
liturgy, I'm not act responsibly as
a priest. I even could possibly be
giving the false impression,
"Oh, he's a Jesuit - those Jesuits." There are
very few of us in the [SCRUBBED] who are active and I don't want to
make it harder for more Jesuits
to serve in [SCRUBBED] .
The more that I'm put into a place
of not publically following general
instructions, the heavier the weight
I feel for not giving proper
instruction, guidance and pastoral
response.
A line from today's morning prayer
called attention to God's mercy. In that
spirit I send you my fraternal
regards as one[SCRUBBED]to another,
and my paternal care as
pastor: that any lacking on our part be made up for
by our union in Christ and the
prayers of the saints, who keep us from
spiritual harm.
Are you still at []SCRUBBED? If you are
open to a cuppa joe or a talk, I would
like that.
Father Friend
[[[ME AGAIN]]]]
Hello again, Father!
You wrote me such a nice letter!
Incidentally if all goes well, I
should still be in [SCRUBBED]about once a month, and[SCRUBBED] should be able to make the Mass at [SCRUBBED]. Just look for me at the end of your Communion
line J.
You do have a way about you…it even seemed to me –although I was pretty steamed
at you at the time—that you were gently
encouraging your parishioners to save their socializing for outside the church.
I already began to see: ‘here is a priest trying to do the right thing and lead
his sheep gently towards a more reverent attitude’.
Where were we? Oh
yes! The USCCB ‘regulation’. Well, Father you already have made a pastoral
exception for my sake and I sincerely appreciate it! You Jesuits!
I’ll take the money and run!!
To tell the truth, I didn’t start kneeling for Communion
until after Pope Benedict’s symbolic act on the Feast of Corpus Christi
2008. It was then that he re-instituted
the use of kneelers for his Masses. [SCRUBBED] saw this—‘[SCRUBBED]—that was enough for her and she started kneeling and
eventually I got up the nerve---(not that it should have taken much since some
people at the Cathedral here have always knealt)—and then one Sunday I
genuflected before our Lord and I just stayed down, put both knees down and
waited. When the EMHC gently placed the
Host on my tongue….Father, I just cannot describe it but I felt like …like this
was nothing routine or ordinary! That maybe this was helping me show Jesus intense devotion and total surrender, total trust to Him that He
deserved! Not that I have intense
devotion…but kneeling helped remind me that I should? I apologize for my clumsy wording. But I think you understand…
Where were we? Darnit! Now I have to get back to that ‘regulation’. As per your advice, I looked it up and got
very sad…and confused. We kneelers
rejoiced when we heard that the 2012 GIRM had removed the stricture that we
must be ‘nagged at’, ‘catechized’ every time we get caught kneeling for Holy
Communion…..the USCCB’s good news for kneelers can be found right here…..
5. What does the Missal say about the posture of the
faithful when receiving Holy Communion? What about Communion in the hand?
Both of these questions are
covered in no. 160 of the GIRM. It states clearly there that the “norm”
established for the United States for reception of Holy Communion is standing.
In the 2003 GIRM, it stated that no one should be refused Communion if they
kneel, but that afterward they should be properly catechized. In the
current edition, the exhortation
to catechesis is removed and the exception to the norm of standing is left to
the discretion of the faithful: “unless an individual member of the
faithful wishes to receive Communion while kneeling.” The Instruction Redemptionis Sacramentum, no. 91, is then cited.<<<<<
Father, I think the USCCB website article to which you referred is simply a reprint of the old 2002 policy found
here… http://www.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=00AgSy Halfway down the page and you can
find the USCCB’s 'current' text verbatim only with a 2002 date on its url.<<<<<
So , recapping:
1)
in 2002 the USCCB said everybody stands or else,
then
2)
in 2003 the GIRM says it’s ok to kneel, but with
mandatory corrective training afterwards
3)
in 2012 USCCB, introducing the 2012 corrected
GIRM, said no more corrective training for kneelers, then
4)
in 2014
the USCCB is back to saying everybody stands or else?!!
I can’t wait to tell [SCRUBBED]]
Frankly, Father, such vacillations
vex me greatly!! When, pardon the term, bureaucrats try to
choreograph us and flip us back and forth
it starts to feel like we’re the property of ‘1984’ or ‘Animal Farm’ despots where
every few years the common folk are obliged to forget the past if they know
what’s good for them!!……
[[ALL FOR NOW!!}
No comments:
Post a Comment